Book of Acts Essay

The Book of Acts The discussion of Act was written by angel Luke. The date of the writing is uncertain, solely most scholars favor the period 8-90 A. D. virtu tot eachyy masses think that Acts re ranges normative guidelines for the New Testament church service for all times. In this witness I think it is agreeable for the book of acts salutary shows the ideal church with corresponding beliefs and values. This kind of church should be present to all even up to the present times. This book, in which St. Luke reads the actions of the apostles, pointly of St. shaft of light and St.Paul, (whose companion in travel he was,) is as it were the centre amongst the religious doctrine and the Epistles. It contains, after a very brief re-capitulation of the evangelical narration, a perpetuation of the history of Christ, the event of his predictions, and a kind of supplement to what he had before spoken to his disciples, by the Holy Ghost now given up unto them. It contains also the seeds, and first stamina of all those things, which are enlarged upon in the epistles. The Gospels treat of Christ the head. The Acts show that the same things befell his body which is animate by his Spirit, persecuted by the world, defended and exalted by God.In this book is shown the Christian doctrine, and the method of applying it to Jews, heathens, and believers that is, to those who are to be converted, and those who are converted the hindrances of it in particular men, in several kinds of men, in different ranks and nations the propagation of the Gospel, and that grand rotary motion among two Jews and heathens the victory thereof, in Spite of all opposition, from all the power, malice, and apprehension of the whole world, spreading from one chamber into temples, houses, streets, markets, fields, inns, prisons, camps, courts, chariots, ships, villages, cities, islands to Jews, heathens, magistrates, generals, soldiers, eunuchs, captives, slaves, women, children, sailors t o Athens, and at length to Rome.Others view it as only descriptive for the 1st century church. Descriptive in the sense that it only describes the pattern and how the church worked during that period of time. The term Acts is non used, as it is sometimes with us, to denote decrees or laws or having to describe it, but it denotes the doings of the apostles. It is a record of what the apostles did in founding and establishing the Christian church.It is deserving of remark, however, that it contains a record of the doings of Peter and Paul. Peter was commissioned to fan out the doors of the Christian church to both Jews and Gentiles, and Paul was chosen to bear the credo especially to the pagan world. As these two apostles were the most prominent and peremptory in founding and organizing the Christian church, it was deemed proper that a special and permanent record should be made of their labors. While some think that it is both a normative guidelines and a description of the chu rch of the 1st century. At the beginning of the book the author states his purpose and that is to explain to Theophilus, and to the world, how Christianity arose and began its sweep across the earth.By this time Christianity appeared to be on the way to becoming a world religion, and some depict of its beginning was needed so that it force appeal to cultured and learned people. It talks about the Day of Pentecost, empower by the Holy Spirit the apostles take the Good News of deliveryman Christ throughout the Mediterranean world. The title is misleading, for Acts is not a record of all the original disciples of Jesus. The book gives the early history of Christianity from Christs ascension outside Jerusalem to Pauls visit in Rome. Chapters 1-12 stress the work of Peter in Judea and nearby lands, mainly among Jews. Chapters 13- 28 tell of the far- ranging missionary preaching of Paul, mainly to gentiles. In my opinion it is a normative guideline for the New Testament church.In the book of Acts, it is shown how the people and the believer should act before God. All antiquity is unanimous in ascribing this book to Luke as its author. It is repeatedly mentioned and quoted by the early Christian writers, and without a dissenting voice is mentioned as the work of Luke. The same thing is ready from the book itself. It professes to see been written by the same person who wrote the Gospel of Luke, Ac 11 was addressed to the same person, and bears manifest mark of being from the same pen. It is designed evidently as a continuation of his Gospel, as in this book he has taken up the history at the very time where he left it in the Gospel, Ac 11, 2.It also shows that the Holy Spirit is really with His people if they lead ask from it, for the Holy Spirit will be their comforter and friend. The church nowadays should be guided by the Holy Spirit for a strong foundation. The gospel should be well delivered and evangelized throughout the world by the believers. They sho uld acts upon what is right just like what Paul and Peter did in the book of Acts where in they werent afraid to spread the good news among all people. This book has commonly been regarded as a history of the Christian church, and of socio-economic class the first ecclesiastical history that was written. But it cannot have been designed as a general history of the church. Many important transactions have been omitted.It gives no account of the church at Jerusalem after the transmutation of Paul it omits his journey into Arabia, Gad 117 gives no account of the propagation of the gospel in Egypt, or in Babylon, 1Pe 513 of the foundation of the church at Rome of many of Pauls voyages and shipwrecks, 2Co 1125 and omits to record the labors of most of the apostles, and confines the narrative principally to the transactions of Peter and Paul. References 1. Book of Acts. New Standard Encyclopedia. Volume 2. Pages 355-356. 2. early days Bible. Holy Bible Contemporary English Version, Gl obal Edition. Pages 861-871 3. Acts of the Apostles. Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia. http//en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Acts_of_the_Apostles