Hustler - Censoring a Film about Censorship :: Movie Film Essays

1 The People vs. Larry Flynt celebrates America for being the strongest country in the world immediately only because we are the acquitst, as Flynt once said. The problem is, that while the ingest triumphantly exhibits the (seemingly obvious) evils of censorship, it hypocritically censors out the most controversial parts. The film champions free speech yet is not able to visually depict the potentially harmful material that the First Amendment defends. The content in Flynts slut magazine absolutely, positively, requires the protection of the First Amendment. The film does not show you why. For how do you expose to mainstream society something that cannot legally be seen in an R-rated film? theatre director Milos Forman, incapable of surmounting this problem, needed to make changes. He removed the most abhorrent aspects of the real Hustler and Flynt, and fabricated the reel socially acceptable, laughable (and point likable) depictions. Consequently, in the process of tel ling this story that Forman wished to dedicate to his hero, the U.S. Justice system, he both sanitizes and canonizes Flynt and Hustler magazine. 2 In this issue essay I entrust first discuss the history of pornography in America and the egress of Hustler. I will then show how the movie makes the viewer face proud of the country without letting the viewer choose if he or she is really pleased with what is being protected, pointing out the impossibility of portraying the prurient images in an R-rated film. After that, I will discuss the possible ramifications of pornography, including military unit against women and children. I will then address the moral implications of a round out freedom of expression and the possible effects of promoting ignorance about pornography through the movie. Finally, I will comment on my views regarding pornography and censorship in our society. The Sexual Revolution in America 3 Since the 1950s, a sexual transmutation has spawned in Americ a, accordingly downgrading previous anathemas in society, give care pre-martial sex, masturbation, and homosexuality. For example, according to an obligate describing the sexual revolution, In the 1950s, less than 25 percent of Americans thought premarital sex was acceptable by the 1970s, more than 75 percent arrange it acceptable (Stossel 74). Norman Podhoretz recounts how in the early 1950s obtaining pornography was like trying to buy illegal drugs. But Playboy changed all of that, as it emerged as an acceptable form of pornography in 1953.